<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running the Net After a Collapse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doc.coker.com.au/internet/running-net-after-collapse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/internet/running-net-after-collapse/</link>
	<description>Documents that are not date based</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: etbe</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/internet/running-net-after-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=22#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Don: When I started working on free software development projects everything was based around emailing the output of diff.  While there are now things like git, the majority of projects and the majority of developers still rely on using email with diff output.

While git is apparently doing a lot of good for the key kernel developers, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a required technology.

Even with git, there are patch dependencies, for example every time I read one of Andrew Morton&#039;s summaries it seems to include some patches being left out due to conflicts or dependencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don: When I started working on free software development projects everything was based around emailing the output of diff.  While there are now things like git, the majority of projects and the majority of developers still rely on using email with diff output.</p>
<p>While git is apparently doing a lot of good for the key kernel developers, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a required technology.</p>
<p>Even with git, there are patch dependencies, for example every time I read one of Andrew Morton&#8217;s summaries it seems to include some patches being left out due to conflicts or dependencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Marti</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/internet/running-net-after-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=22#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget distributed revision control systems.  If you keep projects in git you&#039;re less reliant on far-away data centers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget distributed revision control systems.  If you keep projects in git you&#8217;re less reliant on far-away data centers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

