<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Installing SE Linux on Debian/Lenny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/</link>
	<description>Documents that are not date based</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver W</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Hi

I&#039;m running Debian Lenny with the default SELinux packages installed. Is it normal that I&#039;m getting numerous denials (which I&#039;m gradually fixing using audit2allow, generating my own local.te) in regard to logrotate? This is what I have in my local.te right now:

#============= logrotate_t ==============
allow logrotate_t crond_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t inetd_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t init_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t initrc_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t kernel_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t ntpd_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t postfix_master_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t postfix_qmgr_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t restorecond_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t self:capability sys_ptrace;
allow logrotate_t sshd_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t syslogd_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t udev_t:process ptrace;
allow logrotate_t unconfined_home_dir_t:dir search;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running Debian Lenny with the default SELinux packages installed. Is it normal that I&#8217;m getting numerous denials (which I&#8217;m gradually fixing using audit2allow, generating my own local.te) in regard to logrotate? This is what I have in my local.te right now:</p>
<p>#============= logrotate_t ==============<br />
allow logrotate_t crond_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t inetd_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t init_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t initrc_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t kernel_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t ntpd_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t postfix_master_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t postfix_qmgr_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t restorecond_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t self:capability sys_ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t sshd_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t syslogd_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t udev_t:process ptrace;<br />
allow logrotate_t unconfined_home_dir_t:dir search;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian F</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Hi!

I have another problem since I have installed SELinux and configuring it to run enforced.
I have 2 NTFS hdd which I mount them automatic with FSTAB. Before I installed SELinux they were mounted properly and all was OK. But after installation, when I boot the system come an error that says that ntfs-3g couldn&#039;t be mounted (ntfs-3g mount failed) and suggest to run &quot;modprobe fuse&quot;.
Any idea and suggestions how can I solve this problem?

Thanks,
Cristian F</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>I have another problem since I have installed SELinux and configuring it to run enforced.<br />
I have 2 NTFS hdd which I mount them automatic with FSTAB. Before I installed SELinux they were mounted properly and all was OK. But after installation, when I boot the system come an error that says that ntfs-3g couldn&#8217;t be mounted (ntfs-3g mount failed) and suggest to run &#8220;modprobe fuse&#8221;.<br />
Any idea and suggestions how can I solve this problem?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Cristian F</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian F</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Have u solved this error or warning more.

W: Conflicting distribution: http://www.coker.com.au lenny Release (expected lenny but got )
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems

Thanks,
Cristian F</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have u solved this error or warning more.</p>
<p>W: Conflicting distribution: <a href="http://www.coker.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.coker.com.au</a> lenny Release (expected lenny but got )<br />
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Cristian F</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Coker</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Coker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-479</guid>
		<description>mjf: I run several systems in ways that are similar without problem.

Anything that happens before init is not affected by SE Linux - but such things should not leave user-space processes running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mjf: I run several systems in ways that are similar without problem.</p>
<p>Anything that happens before init is not affected by SE Linux &#8211; but such things should not leave user-space processes running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjf</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>mjf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Hello.

I am using dm-crypted / and /home partitions on my workstation (pure Debian/Lenny, perhaps with some added software like MPlayer from debian-multimedia.org). I would like to start using SELinux on this workstation. I must stress that I use home-brewed initrd to initialize encryption of the partitions (very special one). After pivot_root and executing the system /sbin/init the system boot process continues in common way. Shall I expect some terse complications enabling SELinux in such configuration?

Thank you for your response.

Sincerely,

-- 
mjf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.</p>
<p>I am using dm-crypted / and /home partitions on my workstation (pure Debian/Lenny, perhaps with some added software like MPlayer from debian-multimedia.org). I would like to start using SELinux on this workstation. I must stress that I use home-brewed initrd to initialize encryption of the partitions (very special one). After pivot_root and executing the system /sbin/init the system boot process continues in common way. Shall I expect some terse complications enabling SELinux in such configuration?</p>
<p>Thank you for your response.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
mjf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etbe</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Philip: I&#039;ve updated this document to describe the correct way of doing this.  selinux-basics has commands to do these things, and they were written before your comment (my documentation lagged behind the code - my fault).

Your comment was correct, and will still work for anyone who chooses not to use the scripts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip: I&#8217;ve updated this document to describe the correct way of doing this.  selinux-basics has commands to do these things, and they were written before your comment (my documentation lagged behind the code &#8211; my fault).</p>
<p>Your comment was correct, and will still work for anyone who chooses not to use the scripts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget to uncomment the relevant line in /etc/pam.d/login.  Without this you&#039;ll be logged in as local_login_t which is bad.  Probably good to take a look at the Debian SELinux setup page on the Debian wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/SELinux/Setup

Some of the info there does seem to be out of date however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget to uncomment the relevant line in /etc/pam.d/login.  Without this you&#8217;ll be logged in as local_login_t which is bad.  Probably good to take a look at the Debian SELinux setup page on the Debian wiki page: <a href="http://wiki.debian.org/SELinux/Setup" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.debian.org/SELinux/Setup</a></p>
<p>Some of the info there does seem to be out of date however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etbe</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-420</guid>
		<description>kamil: That&#039;s a cosmetic error.  I haven&#039;t yet worked out how to solve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kamil: That&#8217;s a cosmetic error.  I haven&#8217;t yet worked out how to solve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamil</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>kamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Running apt-get(or aptitude) update gives a warning: &quot;Conflicting distribution: http://www.coker.com.au lenny Release (expected lenny but got )&quot;. However, it seems to download what it should. I have selinux up and running. Do you know what causes this warning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running apt-get(or aptitude) update gives a warning: &#8220;Conflicting distribution: <a href="http://www.coker.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.coker.com.au</a> lenny Release (expected lenny but got )&#8221;. However, it seems to download what it should. I have selinux up and running. Do you know what causes this warning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

