<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Russell Coker's Documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doc.coker.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doc.coker.com.au</link>
	<description>Documents that are not date based</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing SE Linux on Debian/Lenny by etbe</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-420</guid>
		<description>kamil: That's a cosmetic error.  I haven't yet worked out how to solve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kamil: That&#8217;s a cosmetic error.  I haven&#8217;t yet worked out how to solve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing SE Linux on Debian/Lenny by kamil</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/installing-se-linux-on-lenny/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>kamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=43#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Running apt-get(or aptitude) update gives a warning: "Conflicting distribution: http://www.coker.com.au lenny Release (expected lenny but got )". However, it seems to download what it should. I have selinux up and running. Do you know what causes this warning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running apt-get(or aptitude) update gives a warning: &#8220;Conflicting distribution: <a href="http://www.coker.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.coker.com.au</a> lenny Release (expected lenny but got )&#8221;. However, it seems to download what it should. I have selinux up and running. Do you know what causes this warning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Benchmarking Mail Relays and Forwarders by etbe</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/papers/benchmarking-mail-relays-and-forwarders/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=27#comment-359</guid>
		<description>http://etbe.coker.com.au/
Rob: I will write about some other Postal tests at my main blog (see the above URL).

The test was not contrived to abuse DNS, it was designed to simulate one aspect of mailing list performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/" rel="nofollow">http://etbe.coker.com.au/</a><br />
Rob: I will write about some other Postal tests at my main blog (see the above URL).</p>
<p>The test was not contrived to abuse DNS, it was designed to simulate one aspect of mailing list performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Benchmarking Mail Relays and Forwarders by Rob</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/papers/benchmarking-mail-relays-and-forwarders/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=27#comment-358</guid>
		<description>This test seems contrived specifically to abuse DNS and test alias expansion performance, while avoiding the huge performance bottleneck of the queue process.  In order to follow RFC, every file written to the queue is opened O_SYNC and brings with it horrible write performance.  Try a 1:1 or a 1:3 relay test and watch performance tank.


No message store delivery numbers?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This test seems contrived specifically to abuse DNS and test alias expansion performance, while avoiding the huge performance bottleneck of the queue process.  In order to follow RFC, every file written to the queue is opened O_SYNC and brings with it horrible write performance.  Try a 1:1 or a 1:3 relay test and watch performance tank.</p>
<p>No message store delivery numbers?  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RAM Speed according to Memtest86+ by Ben Stringer</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/computers/ram-speed-memtest86/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Stringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=20#comment-119</guid>
		<description>HP BL35p AMD Opteron 2.4Ghz DDR400, 1648 MB/s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HP BL35p AMD Opteron 2.4Ghz DDR400, 1648 MB/s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running the Net After a Collapse by etbe</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/internet/running-net-after-collapse/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=22#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Don: When I started working on free software development projects everything was based around emailing the output of diff.  While there are now things like git, the majority of projects and the majority of developers still rely on using email with diff output.

While git is apparently doing a lot of good for the key kernel developers, I don't think it's a required technology.

Even with git, there are patch dependencies, for example every time I read one of Andrew Morton's summaries it seems to include some patches being left out due to conflicts or dependencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don: When I started working on free software development projects everything was based around emailing the output of diff.  While there are now things like git, the majority of projects and the majority of developers still rely on using email with diff output.</p>
<p>While git is apparently doing a lot of good for the key kernel developers, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a required technology.</p>
<p>Even with git, there are patch dependencies, for example every time I read one of Andrew Morton&#8217;s summaries it seems to include some patches being left out due to conflicts or dependencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running the Net After a Collapse by Don Marti</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/internet/running-net-after-collapse/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/?p=22#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Don't forget distributed revision control systems.  If you keep projects in git you're less reliant on far-away data centers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget distributed revision control systems.  If you keep projects in git you&#8217;re less reliant on far-away data centers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Computer Power Use by Albert Lash</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/environment/computer-power-use/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Lash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/environment/computer-power-use/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>This is a nice collection of information - the best rating I've seen is the PC Engines ALIX - 5 watts of power. A little slow when trying to use X11. One step up from there is the VIA C7. 

I'm grappling with hard drives now - especially a RAID 5 system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice collection of information - the best rating I&#8217;ve seen is the PC Engines ALIX - 5 watts of power. A little slow when trying to use X11. One step up from there is the VIA C7. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m grappling with hard drives now - especially a RAID 5 system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Computer Related Power Use by Computer Power Use &#124; Russell Coker's Documents</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/environment/computer-related-power-use/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Power Use &#124; Russell Coker's Documents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/environment/computer-related-power-use/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.    &#171; Conditions of Sending Email Computer Related Power Use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.    &laquo; Conditions of Sending Email Computer Related Power Use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hotel Rooms vs Apartments by ROYALS of RENT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pros &#38; Cons of Holiday Apartments</title>
		<link>http://doc.coker.com.au/travel/hotel-vs-apartment/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>ROYALS of RENT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pros &#38; Cons of Holiday Apartments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc.coker.com.au/travel/hotel-vs-apartment/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] Apartments iSnare.com Serviced Apartments vs Hotels, Which is Better ApartOtels.com 12.01.2008 Hotel Rooms vs. Apartments Russell Cocker&#8217;s Documents 12.13.2005 The Corporate Apartment Alternative USA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apartments iSnare.com Serviced Apartments vs Hotels, Which is Better ApartOtels.com 12.01.2008 Hotel Rooms vs. Apartments Russell Cocker&#8217;s Documents 12.13.2005 The Corporate Apartment Alternative USA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
